___________________________

 
  חפש באתר :
       

?Comment faire pour enseigner ce qui ne s'enseigne pas
איך לעשות כדי ללמד את מה שלא מלמדים?
 
 
 
 
אם יש אוריינטציה לאקאניאנית, זה שאין שום דוגמה לאקאניאנית, אפילו לא ׳הלא מודע מובנה כשפה׳, שום תיזה nec varietur (ללא שינוי) שתיתן כביכול מקום לאלף בית, מילון, קומפנדיום, דוגמטי.
יש רק שיח המשכי עם הטקסטים המייסדים של האירוע פרויד, מידרש מתמיד שגורם קונפרונטציה ללא הרף עם הרקמה המסמנת של המבנה שלה״
ז'אק-אלן מילר
 
« S’il y a orientation lacanienne, c’est qu’il n’y a aucun dogme lacanien, pas même l’inconscient structuré comme un langage, aucune thèse ne varietur qui donnerait lieu à abécédaire, bréviaire, compendium, dogmatique.
Il y a seulement une Conversation continuée avec les textes fondateurs de l’événement Freud, un Midrash perpétuel qui confronte incessamment l’expérience à la trame signifiante qui la structure.”
-Jacques-Alain Miller
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------


 
 
 

 
 



 
 
 
    תכנית הלימודים 2016-2017
תקבל את האוריינטציה שלה
על בסיס הכותרת
של הכנס NLS 2017
בפריז

בתכנית הלימודים יש מסלול ראשי
וגם יש מספר סדנאות:
"קליניק@קריטית", באחריות ליאת שליט,
ו"שיחת הכפר", בבית חולים כפר שאול.
במסלול הראשי:
כל ימי רביעי מ-16:30 ועד 21:00
בבית ציוני אמריקה, תל אביב.

The theme of the next Congress of the NLS, which will be held in Paris on 29-30 April 2017, is:
 

 
About the Unconscious
 
Place and Interpretation of Formations of the Unconscious
in Psychoanalytical Treatments
 
 

 
It will take place at the Maison de la Chimie, 28 rue Saint-Dominique, 75007 Paris.
 
A detailed presentation of the theme will be sent shortly. Bibliographic references as well as information about the preparation of the Congress will also be sent soon on NLS-messager.
 
" The only difference between what is called a normal relationship of desire and the neurotic, is not simply this paradox, because this paradox of desire is fundamental, it is that the neurotic is open to the existence of this paradox as such, which of course, does not simplify his existence for him, but all the same does not put him in too bad a position compared to a certain point of view, that we can in this instance squarely articulate [as] the point of view of the philosopher.

The point of view of the philosopher is not clear either. In other words, that it can very well be questioned in the same way as the point of view of the neurotic. One does not even know if he has occasion to do it.
Whether this is valid or not, it is sure that it is in the nature of things that it should be so, because it is all the same on something, on a path, on a line, on an opening that he has some relationship with what the philosopher articulates, or at least what he should articulate, because in fact have you seen this problem of desire well and truly, and carefully, and correctly, and powerfully articulated in a philosophical way. Up to the present, one of the things that appears to me as most characteristic of philosophy, is that this is what is most carefully avoided in philosophy.

This would push me to open another parenthesis on the philosophy of action, and which would culminate in the same conclusions, namely that the action that is continually being spoken about, namely when one sees in it some intrusion or other of spontaneity, of the originality of man in so far as he succeeds here in transforming the data of the problem, in transforming the world as they say. It is very peculiar that what is never highlighted is what nevertheless for us is this truth of experience, namely this profoundly paradoxical character and quite related to the paradox, of desire to action, those traits and those features that I began to introduce you to the last time by alluding to the character of exploit, of performance, of demonstration, of action, even of a despairing outcome.

All these terms that I employ are not my own, because the term Verwerfell [?] is employed by Freud to designate the quite paradoxical action, quite qeneralised action, human action. Human action is especially there when one pretends to designate it, in accordance with history, as the passage of the Rubicon. My friend Kojève [?] speaks of it as something which is the point of agreement, the harmonious solution between the present, the past and the future of these souls, even though the last time I passed that way, I always saw it dry. It was immense, and at the time when I was there, it was dry. It was not the same season as when Caesar crossed it; and even in the fact that Caesar crossed the Rubicon with Caesar's genius, in the fact of passing the Rubicon, there is always something which involves one taking the plunge since it is a river."
Lacan, " The formations of the unconscious",  4 th June 1958
 





 
 
 
 


-------
 
 
 
בברכה ובאיחולי שנת לימודים טובה ופוריה,
 
צוות המורים

 

 



 

אודות

 
צוות פרויקט דורa  כולל מורים ומלמדים. בשדה הפרוידיאני מורים מתקבלים על ידי ז'אק-אלן מילר. 
המורים המלמדים בפרויקט דורa , הם אנליטיקאים הרשומים כחברים באסכולה הלאקניאנית החדשה,
New Lacanian School -  NLS


 
 
 
 


DesignHosting & SEO
by  Ibdesign Studio NYC 
קידום אתריםניהול אתרים